“Bad things can happen in bars,” Hatch told the victim,
adding that other people might be more intoxicated than she was. “If you
wouldn’t have been there that night, none of this would have happened to you. I
hope you look at what you’ve been through and try to take something positive
out of it,” Hatch said to the victim in open court. “You learned a lesson about
friendship and you learned a lesson about vulnerability.” Hatch said that the
victim was not to blame in the case, but that all women must be vigilant
against becoming victims. “When you
blame others, you give up your power to change,” Hatch said that her mother
used to say.
So let’s review: The
police officer got his hands slapped, and the victim was dressed down for her
decision to go out and have a cocktail.
To my way of thinking, something is wrong with this picture. First, the
last time I checked, the job of a judge was to hand down legal decisions, not
to moralize to victims of crime about their personal lives, and certainly not
to condescend to victims of sexual assault and humiliate them in a public
courtroom.
Of course what we do not know is how many times Hatch,
appointed by Arizona Governor Jan Brewer (right), has uttered similar personal
judgments in her courtroom. It is,
without question, an abuse of power, and more importantly, such communication
from judge to victim is likely to further discourage already embarrassed
victims from coming forward to seek justice.
It is pretty much the same thing as telling a rape victim that she
wouldn’t have been raped if she hadn’t worn such provocative clothing.
In this case, the plaintiff went public with the judge’s
unacceptable behavior and demanded an apology. Caving only to extreme public
pressure, Hatch ultimately did apologize.
It rang hollow, since clearly no apology would have been forthcoming had
it not been made public that she preached her wholly un-judicial, albeit highly
judgmental gospel in the courtroom.
Victims who are blamed by people in authoritative positions
are usually women. I somehow cannot envision Judge Hatch telling a male
plaintiff that had he just not gone out to watch a football game at the corner
bar he would not have been punched by a drunk patron. And as for “bad things”
happening in bars, I would just like Hatch to know that bad things happen also
in grocery stores, movie theatres (remember Aurora, CO?), airports, schools,
hospitals and just about every public place there is. Should we all just stay home Judge?
Meanwhile, about the same time the uproar was happening in
Flagstaff, a much higher profile authority figure was spouting off his own
sexist nonsense, except this time it happened on national television. Once again, evangelistic whack job Pat
Robertson made headlines when he answered a query from a viewer who couldn’t
figure out what to do about his difficult wife.
Watch:
This time the woman is presumably not a victim (yet), but Robertson would have the husband turn her
into one. Remember, this is the same guy who once said, "The feminist
agenda is not about equal rights for women. It is about a socialist, anti-family
political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their
children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians."
I promise you he truly did say that.
Let’s keep in mind that this is also the man who said that
if a man is married to a woman who has Alzheimer’s disease, “I know it sounds
cruel, but if he's going to do something, he should divorce her and start all
over again, but to make sure she has custodial care, somebody looking after
her."
All of this and so much more reminds us that despite years
of feminist doctrine, legislative action for equality and institutional
recognition of the relevance of equal rights, we are still evidently a paternalistic
society that enables people in powerful positions to perpetuate raw sexism. Should
Hatch remain on the bench? Many say no.
Petitions are circulating demanding her resignation. Should Robertson continue
to spout his nonsense on national television? Maybe, maybe not. He has lost so
much credibility over the years with his outlandish views that the thinking
public pays little attention to his counsel now. Still, it begs the question: Who is
monitoring state-appointed and self-appointed authority figures, and if no one
is on watch, do victims run the risk of being victimized all over again when they seek justice
or solutions?
No comments:
Post a Comment